ChinaKnowledge.de -
An Encyclopaedia on Chinese History, Literature and Art

chaju zhi 察舉制, commandery quota system of official recruitment

Feb 12, 2019 © Ulrich Theobald

The commandery quota system (chaju zhi 察舉制, lit. "elevation after examination"), also called "elevation on recommendation" (jianju 薦舉), was a means of recruitment for offices in the local and low-level central administration between the Han 漢 (206 BCE-220 CE) and the Sui 隋 (581-618) period. Classified tests (kemu 科目) were established as needed, and the government ordered the heads of the relevant departments or administrative units to select appropriate and competent personnel. The recommended persons were appointed (luyong 錄用) after evaluation by the central government. In the same way, promotions and transfers (sheng qian 升遷) were carried out.

Tests were carried out in regular intervals and were therefore called "regular tests" (changke 常科) or "annual elevations" (suiju 歲舉). Qualification was assessed according to moral standards such as filiality and incorruptibility (xiaolian 孝廉) or "cultivated talent" (xiucai 秀才). The Tang-period 唐 (618-907) commentator Yan Shigu 顏師古 (581-645) defined: "Filial piety (xiao 孝) means to serve father and mother well (shan shi fumu 善事父母), and incorruptibility (lian 廉) means purity and sincerity (qingjie you lian'ou 清潔有廉隅)."

Extraordinary tests were held on imperial edicts and were, therefore, called "special tests" (teke 特科) or "elevations by edict" (zhaoju 詔舉). In such cases, the candidates were tested whether they were "worthies" (xianliang 賢良), literati (wenxue 文學), experts in the Confucian Classics (mingjing 明經), or such in "possession of the Way (i.e., virtue)" (youdao 有道).

Candidates for all types were either commoners or petty officials already holding an office (liyuan 吏員). Because candidates hailed "from the villages", the method was also known as "elevation and selection from among the villages and hamlets" (xiang ju li xuan 鄉舉里選).

This system was initiated in the early years after the foundation of the Han dynasty and replaced the tradition of office inheritance. It appears that the involvement of new people in the administration increased flexibility and broke down encrusted structures. Emperor Wen 漢文帝 (r. 180-157 BCE) proclaimed an edict in 178 to "present capable and good persons who are four-square and upright and are able to speak frankly and unflinchingly admonish the emperor" (ju xianliang fangzheng neng zhiyan jijian zhe 舉賢良方正能直言極諫者, transl. Dubs 1938). In 165, he ordered all princes, ministers, and governors (taishou 太守) to carry out this form of discussion. More than a hundred selected persons participated in the political discussions (duice 對策) and were then, according to their performance, appointed to offices. In this way, the extraordinary tests were regularised.

During the reign of Emperor Wu 漢武帝 (r. 141-87 BCE), Dong Zhongshu 董仲舒 (179-104 BCE) brought forward the argument that too many officials were still appointed by inheritance (ren zi 任子) or because they had paid for it (zi xuan 貲選). He recommended that, instead, each marquis (liehou 列侯, see titles of nobility) or governor present annually two "worthies" (xianzhe 賢者) for appointment.

In 134, Emperor Wu ordered a corresponding edict to present one filial (xiaozhe 孝者) and one incorrupt person (lianzhe 廉者) per commandery (jun 郡). This system became the common form of recruitment during the Han period.

In the course of time, a specialisation in examinations emerged, with separate tests for candidates with literary background (wenxue 文學), upright and straightforward ones (fangzheng 方正), very filial ones (zhixiao 至孝), virtuous ones (youdao 有道), honest and sincere persons (dunpu 敦樸), careful and competent ones (zhiju 治劇), braves (yongmeng 勇猛), strategists (bingfa 兵法), law experts (mingfa 明法) or experts in Yin-Yang phenomena and natural portents (ming yinyang zaiyi 明陰陽災異, see magicians).

Most candidates had to participate in "public" discourses, whose themes were determined by the emperor and were meant to demonstrate the political knowledge of the participants. Experts in the Classics (mingjing) had to undergo an examination requiring "anwers pronounced quickly as arrows go" (shece 射策). The annual examinations included such for primary candidates and such for persons already serving (lianli ke 廉吏科). The examination for "cultivated talents" (xiucai) began as a special test but became an annual regular one in the late Former Han period 前漢 (206 BCE-8 CE).

The selection was usually presided over by a regional inspector (cishi 刺史) who was responsible for the quota system in provinces (zhou 州) and commanderies. During the reign of Emperor Guangwu 漢光武帝 (r. 25-57 CE), whose personal name was Liu Xiu 劉秀, the term xiucai was renamed maocai 茂才 because xiu was then a taboo word.

Candidates having passed the xiaolian examination were not directly appointed to an office, but first served in the Imperial Palace—often in the night watch (suwei 宿衛)—to learn more about administrative matters and in order to further evaluate their competence. Only after selection (xuanba 選拔), they were appointed to local offices like district magistrate (xianling 縣令) or manager of a princely household (zhang 長, cheng 丞, xiang 相) or in the central government. After successful service, a promotion to the post of regional inspector or governor might be offered. The book Hanjiuyi 漢舊儀, surviving in fragments, reports that under Emperor Wu, candidates having passed the examination were appointed attendant gentlemen (langzhong 郎中), and then, after successful evaluation, promoted into the Imperial Secretariat (shangshu 尚書), or to the post of palace attendant (shizhong 侍中) or attendant censor (shiyushi 侍御史) (Gao 1997).

This procedure was further cemented in the early Eastern Han period 東漢 (25-220 CE). Experience in practical service became a prerequisite for further promotion, barring the most talented candidates. The first decision to tie the quota of candidates to the size of the local population was made in 85 CE. In the commanderies and princedoms (wangguo 王國, guo 國), 5 candidates for the mingjing examination were to be presented per 100,000 persons, and for leftover numbers less than 100,000 people, 3 persons. Emperor He 漢和帝 (r. 88-106) reduced this quota to one candidate for every 200,000 persons. In smaller commanderies, the quota was to be fulfilled in two-year intervals, and in very small units of less than 100,000 inhabitants, every three years, a candidate would be presented.

In 132 CE, the government decided that average graduates (xiadi zhe 下第者) of the mingjing examination were appointed (bu 補) trainees of erudites (boshi dizi 博士弟子) in the National University (taixue 太學). In 147 CE, graduates of the other examinations aged 16 sui and above were given the same right. The status of trainee would give them the option to participate in the mingjing examination. A newly introduced examination was the "apprentice examination" (tongke 童科) for boys between 12 and 16 sui. Graduates were made apprentice gentleman (tongzilang 童子郎).

In 132, Zuo Xiong 左雄 (d. 138 CE), Director of the Imperial Secretariat (shangshu ling 尚書令), suggested that candidates for the "elevation of filial and incorrupt" persons (xiaolianju 孝廉舉) had to be younger than 40 sui. Moreover, their family background came into focus. Scions of average households were checked concerning their "family laws" (zhusheng shi jiafa 諸生試家法), i.e., the mastering of Confucian propriety, while the government requested of offsprings of literati families a test of the family's literary abilities as seen in official documents produced by them (wenli ke jianzou 文吏課箋奏). The quota system for official recruitment thus combined recommendations from local officials with an examination conducted by the central government.

Until the early years of the Later Han period, the quota system was implemented consistently and strictly. Abuse was even punished, and the person responsible for the appointment or promotion of "unworthy" persons was punished by dismissal or demotion. The success of the system can be seen in the confirmation that "many a high official came out of this system" (ming gong ju qing duo chu zhi 名公巨卿多出之). In the 2nd century CE, the political power of eminent families (haoqiang 豪強, haomen 豪門, menfa 門閥) grew, enabling them to enforce the appointment or promotion of their offspring. A common saying from that time held that:

舉秀才不知書,
察孝廉父別居,
寒素清白濁如泥,
高第良將怯如雞。
Promoted "cultivated talents" cannot read,
Selected "filial ones" desert their fathers,
The "pure ones" from ordinary families are dirty like mud,
And "good officers" chosen for high positions are shy like hens.

Sons of eminent families were, in fact, appointed to offices whose rank corresponded to the rank of the family according to the nine-rank system (jiupin zhongzheng zhi 九品中正制). "Filiality" or "pureness" in this system was not a matter of individual persons but of family clusters. The negative side of this system is reflected in contemporary writings, such as Wang Fu's 王符 (83-170) Qianfulun 潛夫論, or the Daoist book Baopuzi 抱樸子. The outcome of this system was that "no scion of a poor family was in high offices, and no son of an eminent family had a humble post" (shangpin wu hanmen, xiapin wu shizu 上品無寒門,下品無世族).

During the Three Empires 三國 (220~280 CE) and Jin 晉 (265-420) periods, the quota system remained the formal norm for access to the officialdom. Emperor Wen 魏文帝 (r. 220-226) of the Wei dynasty 曹魏 (220-265) fixed a quota of one "filial-incorrupt person" per 100,000 inhabitants of a commandery, and abolished the ceiling age of 40 sui for the entry of official career. The Jin dynasty created the discursive test (duice 對策) for the xiucai examination. It consisted of five parts (wu ce 五策) and included written discussions about the Classics as well as the writing of a treatise (lun 論). Only those who had successfully answered all five questions were made appointees.

The Eastern Jin 東晉 (317-420) fixed a quota of one "filial-incorrupt" person annually per commandery, with the exception of the commanderies of Danyang 丹陽, Wujun 吳郡, Guiji 會稽, and Wuxing 吳興, which had to present two persons per year. The province of Yangzhou 揚州 would have to provide two "cultivated talents" (xiucai) per year, while the other provinces would provide only one, or one every three years.

Emperor Ming 宋明帝 (r. 465-472) of the Liu-Song dynasty 劉宋 (420-479) changed the conditions of the xiucai test by giving grades. Candidates passing all five questions were called "primus" (shangdi 上第), those succeeding in three or four questions "average" (zhongdi 中第), and those having just passed in two questions were given the grade "fair" (xiadi 下第). All others failed.

It is known that the various regimes in northern China in the 4th and 5th centuries used the system. The xiucai examination consisted of five questions, and the xiaolian test comprised 10 paragraphs, of which 8 had to be answered successfully. Commanderies were divided into 1st- and 2nd-class provinces (shangzhou 上州, xiazhou 下州, shangjun 上郡, xiajun 下郡), the former having a quota of one xiucai candidate per year, the latter one every three years.

The Han-period custom of having appointees first serve in the imperial palace to train them was abolished. Most graduates were directly appointed erudites (boshi 博士), assistants in the Palace Library (bishulang 祕書郎), editorial directors (zhuzuolang 著作郎), supernumerary gentleman cavalier attendants (yuanwai sanji shilang 員外散騎侍郎), audience attendants (fengchaoqing 奉朝請) or district magistrates (xianling) or petty officials (liaoshu 僚屬) in the central civilian administration (gongfu 公府), the military administration (junfu 軍府), the princedoms or the provincial administration (zhoufu 州府).

The aspect of recommendation lost its importance during the Southern and Northern dynasties period 南北朝 (300~600), and the central examination gained prominence. This trend led to the creation of the civil examination system during the Tang period, which allowed candidates to enrol on their own and were not dependent on a recommendation. At the same time, the strict quota system was given up. This decision drastically enlarged the pool of candidates the central government could choose from.

Sources:
Gao Shendong 高申東. 1998. "Chaju 察舉." In Zhongguo gudai dianzhang zhidu da cidian 中國古代典章制度大辭典, edited by Tang Jiahong 唐嘉弘, 72. Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou guji chubanshe.
Gao Zhongjun 高仲君. 1997. "Chaju 察舉." In Zhonghua guocui da cidian 中華國粹大辭典, edited by Men Kui 門巋, and Zhang Yanjin 張燕瑾, 44. Xianggang: Guoji wenhua chuban gongsi.
Jiaoyu da cidian bianzuan weiyuanhui 《教育大辭典》編纂委員會, ed. 1991. Jiaoyu da cidian 教育大辭典, part 8, Zhongguo gudai jiaoyu shi 中國古代教育史, vol. 1, 171. Shanghai: Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe.
Lü Zongli 呂宗力, ed. 1994. Zhongguo lidai guanzhi da cidian 中國歷代官制大辭典, 842. Beijing: Beijing chubanshe.
Pi Chunxie 皮純協, Xu Liming 徐理明, and Cao Wenguang 曹文光, eds. 1986. Jianming zhengzhixue cidian 簡明政治學辭典, 662. Zhengzhou: Henan renmin chubanshe.
Shi Xuanyuan 施宣圓 et al., eds. 1987. Zhongguo wenhua cidian 中國文化辭典, 431. Shanghai: Shanghai shehui kexue yuan chubanshe.
Yan Buke 閻步克. 1992. "Chaju 察舉." In Zhongguo da baike quanshu 中國大百科全書, vol. Zhongguo lishi 中國歷史, vol. 1, 73. Beijing and Shanghai: Zhongguo da baike quanshu chubanshe.
Zhang Liangcai 張良才. 1997. "Chaju 察舉." In Zhonghua guocui da cidian 中華國粹大辭典, edited by Men Kui 門巋, and Zhang Yanjin 張燕瑾, 250. Xianggang: Guoji wenhua chuban gongsi.
Zhou Fazeng 周發增, Chen Longtao 陳隆濤, and Qi Jixiang 齊吉祥, eds. 1998. Zhongguo gudai zhengzhi zhidu shi cidian 中國古代政治制度史辭典, 71. Beijing: Shoudu shifan daxue chubanshe.